(no subject)
France
[info]metaspective
"And my body is no temple. That’s why I’m altaring it." - Phil Plait in response to some idiot who thought he shouldn't get a tattoo because "your body is a temple."

I <3 bad puns.

Exerpt from Neal Stephenson's Novel, 'Quicksilver'
France
[info]metaspective
One cannot board a ship without imagining ship-wreck. Daniel envisions it as being like an opera, lasting several hours and proceeding through a series of Acts.

Act I: The hero rises to clear skies and smooth sailing. The sun is following a smooth and well-understood celestial curve, the sea is a plane, sailors are strumming guitars and carving objets d'art, while erudite passengers take the air and muse about grand philosophical schemes.

Act II: A change in the weather is predicted based on readings in the captain's barometer. Hours later it appears in the distance, a formation of clouds that is observed, sketched, analyzed, and analyzed. Sailors cheerfully prepare for the weather.

Act III: The storm hits. Changes are noted on the barometer, thermometer, clinometer, compass, and other instruments--celestial bodies are, however, no longer visible--the sky is a boiling chaos torn unpredictably by bolts--the sea is rough, the ship heaves, the cargo remains tied safely down, but most passengers are too ill or worried to think. The sailors are all working without rest--some of them sacrifice chickens in the hopes of appeasing their gods. The rigging glows with St. Elmo's fire--this is attributed to supernatural forces.

Act IV: The masts snap and the rudder goes missing. There is panic. Lives are already being lost, but it is not known how many. Cannons and casks are careering randomly about, making it impossible to guess who'll be alive and who dead ten seconds from now. The compass, barometer, et cetera, are all destroyed and the record of their readings swept overboard--maps dissolve--sailors are helpless--those who are still alive and sentient can think of nothing to do but pray.

Act V: The ship is no more. Survivors cling to casks and planks, fighting off the less fortunate and leaving them to drown. Everyone has reverted to a feral state of terror and misery. Huge waves shove them around without any pattern, carnivorous fish use living persons as food. There is no relief in sight, or even imaginable.

Men of his generation* were born during Act V and raised in act IV. As students, they huddled in a small vulnerable bubble of Act III. The human race has, actually, been in Act V for most of its history and has recently accomplished the miraculous feat of assembling splintered planks afloat a stormy sea ito a saling-ship and then, having climbed onboard it, building instruments with which to measure the world, and then finding a kind of regularity in those measurements. When they were at Cambridge, Newton was surrounded by a personal nimbus of Act II and was well on his way to Act I.

But they had, perversely, been living among people who were peering into the wrong end of the telescope, or something, and who had convinced themselves that the opposite was true--that the world had once been a splendid orderly place--that humans had made a reasonably trouble-free move from the Garden of Eden to Athens of Plato and Aristotle, stopping over in the Holy Land to encrypt the secrets of the Universe in the pages of the Bible, and that everything had been slowly, relentlessly falling apart ever since.

-----------
* In England, the Civil War that brought Cromwell to power, and on the Continent, the Thiry Years' War.

[Stolen from a friend's FB page. I'm sure neither he nor Neal would mind.]

(no subject)
France
[info]metaspective
...Simon Keegan, the trading standards inspector employed by the Northern Ireland Trading Standards Service, told me that "there is no conclusive scientific evidence stating that chiropractic does not offer effective treatment for infantile colic."

As it happens, to the best of my knowledge, there is no conclusive scientific evidence that chewing my toe-nail clippings is not an effective cure for Aids, but I would rather hope that trading standards services would take some action against me should I ever decide to set up a business based upon this claim.
LOL!

From: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jun/19/chiropractic-bca-mca-singh

(no subject)
France
[info]metaspective
"Ever stop to think about the important questions of life?"

Why yes I have, dear flier handed to me by a fellow student on campus, yes I have.

"Answer a quick quiz online and get in the draw to win a FREE $800 laptop computer"

Oh wow! A chance to win an $800 laptop and all I have to do is answer a quick quiz?! I bet there's no catch whatsoever!

Umm, yeah...

Long story short, the quiz is an ad for a Christian outreach club.

Considering some of the answers I gave, I don't think I'm going to win the prize... They say, "we are inviting all people from all walks of life to bring out their honest thoughts and opinions. So please don't tell us what you think we want to hear; we aren't interested in that" But I'm pretty sure they won't appreciate their God being referred to as narcissistic and psychopathic...

Poor form, Dan.
France
[info]metaspective
Sometimes I wonder if even 10% of the people who proclaim their belief in God actually do believe in God. I am particularly unimpressed by those who proclaim the loudest; they demonstrate by their very activism that they fear the effect of any erosion of religion, and they must think that erosion is likely if they don't put their shoulders to the wheel. If they were more confident and secure in their religious convictions, they probably wouldn't waste their time trying to discredit a few atheists.
The same could be said of Dan. If he were more confident in his secular convictions he wouldn't waste his time discrediting a few believers (or believers in belief).

Both claims ignore a key point: the activism of Dan and his foes isn't based on their convictions - it's based on their disagreements with the behaviour of the other side. Believers don't just fear the erosion of religion. Just like Dan and other vocal atheists (and me too), they fear the consequences of people continuing to be brought up with and maintain what they see as an invalid understanding of the world. Whereas I'm sure Dan would acknowledge that fear in himself (though he'd probably call it a valid concern, which I think it is), he's strawmanned religious people by ignoring it in them (at least in that article).

It was a useful crutch, but we've outgrown it. Denmark, according to a recent study, is the sanest, healthiest, happiest, most crime-free nation in the world, and by and large the Danes simply ignore the God issue. We should certainly hope that those who believe in belief are wrong, because belief is waning fast, and the props are beginning to buckle.

...

At what point should those who just believe in belief throw in the towel and stop trying to get their children and neighbours to cling to what they themselves no longer need?
Pointing out that the Danes do fine without active belief in God does nothing to show how people in a different environment would fare. Have the Danes ever had the same strong, pervasive, active, vocal religious culture that America now has? If so, what changed? If not, the comparison is irrelevant.

I happen to agree with Dan on many things, but I think he failed to convey anything meaningful or useful with that article, except as a pep-talk for those who already agree with him and don't maintain an unbiased skepticism. And I see little problem with that, except perhaps where they'll be heard by people who disagree; their perspective would be reinforced. And that's exactly what's shown by many of the comments in reply to the article.

Link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/jul/16/daniel-dennett-belief-atheism

Update: Dan confirmed in an email that time and space limitations did oblige him to keep it short, but that he would be elaborating in an upcoming major article. Sweet.

(no subject)
France
[info]metaspective
We may be, as I have said before on this blog, storytellers by nature; but nature itself is not story-like. And because the stories that we weave can so often be limiting, can so often trap us, or can so often simply go over the same old ground, again and again, this attention to the world can loosen the bonds a little, can give us over to a kind of thinking that can help us find new paths and tracks through the world.
As Will points out, religious thought just seems to add noise to a world which is already noisy enough. Much as Shakespeare (through Salisbury in King John) cautioned us against the wasteful and ridiculous excess of gilding refined gold. Simply put, the world is wonderful as it is—adding layers of "parochial human drama" to it is plain silly.


Pronouns
France
[info]metaspective
My Google skills are failing me. Can anyone point me to a definitive list of English pronouns listed somewhere more authoritative than wikipedia?

(Relevance: I got into an argument with someone about whether or not "God" is a pronoun. Since pronouns are a closed word class a definitive list which doesn't include "God" would decisively end the argument (of course so would a list which includes "God", but that wouldn't be as much fun for me))

Evidence that physicists spend too much time making jokes about sex and not enough having it.
France
[info]metaspective
Self- interactions involving a solitary phase are generally difficult to observe, although examples have been documented that involve short-lived but highly-excited states accompanied by various forms of stimulated emission, although the resulting fluxes are generally not well measured. This form of interaction also appears to be the current preoccupation of string theorists.
LOL!
  • Leave a comment
  • Add to Memories

Breaking News: People still clueless.
France
[info]metaspective
If people don't know something as basic as the location of organs in the human body, it's no wonder they have no idea about what will and what won't cure their various ailments.

Why we do science rather than mysticism...
France
[info]metaspective
So Satya, a writer for the Examiner1 objects to crashing a lunar orbiter into the Moon, on the basis of metaphor confused with reality. Making fun of her lunacy (I stole that one from one of the commenters) feels like beating up a 5 year old might, so I'll just point out one particularly unenlightened paragraph:

Purposefully crashing something into the moon just to watch what happens is akin to a schoolboy cutting up a live frog to see what makes it jump. It is an example of the domination of the left-brained rational scientific approach over the intuitive.
No doubt Satya has no idea that cutting up a frog (not live) was what lead Luigi Galvani to discover bioelectricity. Ironically it may have been Luigi's intuitive, unscientific acceptance of vitalism which prevented him from realising (or accepting) the truth about what he'd discovered, instead leading him to propose that the eletricity he'd observed was instrinsic to the animal, produced by the muscles. This was wrong, demonstrated as such by Alessandro Volta who produced electricity outside the body with a few simple materials, resulting in the invention of the world's first battery. An invention without which Satya would be unable to share her ignorance with everyone via the Internet. Perhaps that would have been a good thing after all.

(and yes, the analogy fails, as does any relevance to what might have passed for an argument if it were any more than misguided rhetoric. I'll leave it as a basic exercise for the reader to show how the analogy fails.)


1. Not a prestigious position. The quality of many of their articles is similar to the one linked to.

You are viewing [info]metaspective's journal